posted by admin on Sep 10
campbelp2002 asked:
Some of the early high efficiency ones had 2, and the old wind chargers had many, but what is it about 3 that makes it the modern choice?
OK, I did assume it was for efficiency, but why is 3 more efficient that 2 or 4 or any other number? Or is there also a non-efficiency reason, like damping out resonant vibrations or something like that?
Some of the early high efficiency ones had 2, and the old wind chargers had many, but what is it about 3 that makes it the modern choice?
OK, I did assume it was for efficiency, but why is 3 more efficient that 2 or 4 or any other number? Or is there also a non-efficiency reason, like damping out resonant vibrations or something like that?